George W. Bush, tio års skillnad
Slutsatsen i filmen att Bush d.y. skulle lida av någon sorts sjukdom får väl tiden utvisa. Intressantare är det som Noam Chomsky i samband med sina tal och artiklar nuddat vid - att det inte skulle förvåna honom om det visar sig att presidentens PR-rådgivare instruerat honom att inte vara så vältalig som han bevisligen kan vara, ja, rent utav en smula "korkad". Detta för att stärka bilden av honom som en hederlig "Average Joe". Chomsky uttrycker det bättre i ett av sina tal för några år sedan:
It wouldn’t be surprising to learn that Bush is carefully trained to say “nucular” and “misunderestimate” and the other silliness that intellectuals like to ridicule. That’s probably about as real as the ranch constructed for him, and the rest of the folksy manner. After all, it wouldn’t do to present him as a spoiled frat boy from Yale who became rich and powerful thanks to his rich and powerful connections.
Eller som här i en intervju:
So Bush is created to be an ordinary guy with his sleeves rolled up and you could have a drink with him in a bar. My guess is he's taught to make those mispronunciations and grammatical errors; I doubt that he talked like that at Yale. He's probably taught that way so that 'them liberal intellectuals' would make fun of him and then they can say, oh yeah, he's an ordinary guy just like you, going off to his ranch.
